PRC Catalogue(s)

This is the place to come for advance notice of new issues. To find out if your stamp is a reprint. To post ideas about why a certain stamp was issued. To announce a newly discovered variety, etc., We have experts Bill and Archie on hand and happy to help.

Moderators: archiem, doc032848, wlin98004

Post Reply
User avatar
archiem
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:41 am
Location: Florida
Contact:

PRC Catalogue(s)

Post by archiem »

New PRC catalogue, or ay least new to me. Postage Stamp Catalogue of the PRC 1949-2015. Published by CS Philatelic Agency, Singapore: http://www.cs.com.sg. Retail price: S$ 30, RMB 150, US $ 36, UK L 24. I got mine through eBay. It took maybe 10 days to arrive in the US.

It is the same size and has the same general layout as the most recent Yang PRC Catalogue 1949-2009, the 15th edition.

Anyone seen it yet and have any comments?

dzhuo
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 1:39 am

Re: PRC Catalogue(s)

Post by dzhuo »

archiem wrote:
Thu Oct 05, 2017 5:34 pm
I got mine through eBay. It took maybe 10 days to arrive in the US.
How do you like it? Are the catalog values comparable to other major catalogs?

User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 7:14 pm
Location: Rural Sussex, England
Contact:

Re: PRC Catalogue(s)

Post by admin »

So which is the best PRC catalogue available today.

I like something with lots of pictures and detail, why they were issued, what the images mean, etc. But it must be in English because I don't read Chinese.

User avatar
archiem
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:41 am
Location: Florida
Contact:

Re: PRC Catalogue(s)

Post by archiem »

Sorry for the delay in responding, have been out of town.

The catalogue parallels the Yang catalogue quite closely. I would have to say there are certain things I prefer in the Yang, but there are also many things I prefer in this SC catalogue.

I hesitate to comment on prices because the PRC market is so volatile. Prices for most everything I looked at were above the Yang values, significantly. But PRC values can change so fast, I am always suspect when I see them in print. And being in America, even with the Internet, I have little way of keeping up with daily/current prices. I use catalogue prices as more of a guide to what is more expensive than another, and how much so.

I have some specific comments I will be posting. But note that this company, like Yang, is also a retail stamp firm, so they are aware of current values. And being in Singapore, they are much closer to the China market than am I.

User avatar
archiem
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:41 am
Location: Florida
Contact:

Re: PRC Catalogue(s)

Post by archiem »

Some comments on the two catalogues above. I am going to use the R1 set as a comparison. But before I do, note that printing and publishing technology is advancing as is almost everything. The Yang catalogue is getting close to ten years old, and that makes for a big difference in photography, printing, and pricing. Some would even say not a fair comparison.

Yang and the CS catalogue agree on issue date, 1950.02.10, perforations, sheet composition and printer. Yang does not list the stamp size, which I find very useful when examining S/S's. CS does list stamp size.
CS adds number issued for each denomination.
CS's diagram for originals vs reprints is much clearer, larger and much improved.
CS shows the set images on the left, the text about the set on the right throughout the catalogue.
Both catalogues use same print font, which as I age becomes too small and too light. I find I use my magnifier more each day.
Both catalogues picture all stamps in full color.
CS stamp images are bigger, and to me, clearer.
Yang has 269 pages, CS has 271.
CS for whatever reason lists few varieties. The 8 fen Shanghai print of the R8 set (Peasants and Soldiers) is not listed. If you fail to list even such major varieties as this, not sure you can call yourself a specialist catalogue. Even the Scott lists the Shanghai 8 fen print variety.
But note the CS catalogue in this same set says 2.5 fen and 10 fen were printed by China Modern Printing Works, the rest of the set by People's Bank of China. Yang lacks printer info on many issues.

So understand that both catalogues have good points, both are lacking in some areas.

I will have more comments to make over time, but encourage anyone to comment, that is what a forum is for after all, discussion.

User avatar
archiem
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:41 am
Location: Florida
Contact:

Re: PRC Catalogue(s)

Post by archiem »

I was at my local library using a 2018 edition of the Scott Catalogue for China and noticed this catalogue is advertised there. Scott has gotten too expensive for me, so I use the library copies.

Post Reply