Search found 150 matches
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 7:30 am
- Forum: Join the Great MLO Review
- Topic: Kia Mu Sze
- Replies: 2
- Views: 483
Re: Kia Mu Sze
Hi Mike, I'm sorry, but the postmarks are fake... is an old confirmed fake postmark (registered as F1 of Jiamusi). This is not the only one, there were more fake postmarks used in Jiamusi around. How to tell... well, there are many fake covers with this postmark around and this postmark was never fo...
- Sun May 31, 2020 2:08 pm
- Forum: Chinese Philately
- Topic: Is This China Qing Dynasty Lungchow Cancellation Real?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 425
Re: Is This China Qing Dynasty Lungchow Cancellation Real?
This postmark from Lungchow is super fake... 

- Thu Sep 26, 2019 4:10 pm
- Forum: Join the Great MLO Review
- Topic: Block of Harbin May 1946 ~ October 1946
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1515
Block of Harbin May 1946 ~ October 1946
Hello! Can someone confirm the dates about the block of Harbin for the whole postage services?
- Thu Aug 29, 2019 9:19 am
- Forum: Report Fakes, Forgeries & Fantasy Items Here
- Topic: Have you seen this fakes before?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1182
Re: Have you seen this fakes before?
Clear to see the stamps have a fake perforation.
- Tue Feb 26, 2019 12:35 pm
- Forum: Discuss Peoples Republic of China Issues Here
- Topic: PRC C2 4-4
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2689
Re: PRC C2 4-4
Even with such good scans you are not able to differ the reprints with originals. That's bit "awful" You just rejected and returned a fine original stamp to the eBay seller. Maybe your eyes can't see this clearly so I made a 200% scan for you and add some arrows (left original / right the reprint), ...
- Sun Feb 17, 2019 4:14 am
- Forum: Report Fakes, Forgeries & Fantasy Items Here
- Topic: eBay Sellers - China Stamp Society Findings
- Replies: 20
- Views: 10144
Re: eBay Sellers - China Stamp Society Findings
The fake was sold for 686 USD. Around 50% of market value and 100% too much for this worthless shit.
- Tue Feb 12, 2019 7:26 am
- Forum: Report Fakes, Forgeries & Fantasy Items Here
- Topic: eBay Sellers - China Stamp Society Findings
- Replies: 20
- Views: 10144
Re: eBay Sellers - China Stamp Society Findings
Here is another dangerours fake (chemical removed postmark and overprint): https://www.ebay.de/itm/P-R-China-1950-Sc-30a-China-SC2a-Unissued-Without-Surcharge-MLH-CV-1200-00/264184110400 The eBay seller who try to cheat is this time "yhan902" from USA. Maybe something you can mention in next Clipper...
- Wed Jan 23, 2019 7:44 pm
- Forum: Join the Great MLO Review
- Topic: Kerr 131 / wrong town
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1493
Kerr 131 / wrong town
I'm really wondering, why nobody ever noticed, Kerr 131 was issued in Longzhen (龍鎮) under the jurisdiction of Bei’an (北安) and not Longjing (龍井)? Both towns have a distance of more than 1.000 km. Somewhere earlier I wrote I have already a long list of towns which were wrongly located by Kerr, that's ...
- Wed Jan 23, 2019 7:28 pm
- Forum: Discuss Peoples Republic of China Issues Here
- Topic: PRC C2 4-4
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2689
Re: PRC C2 4-4
Maybe this page helps: https://philachina.org/chinese-peoples-political-consultative-conference-%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%91%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E5%8D%94%E5%95%86%E6%9C%83%E8%AD%B0%E7%B4%80%E5%BF%B5 The scan of the stamp is very bad. Looks like reprint, but the scan is such bad, part of it is ...
- Fri Oct 26, 2018 5:01 am
- Forum: Chinese Philately
- Topic: 2 cent 1898 brown
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2160
Re: 2 cent 1898 brown
HI archiem,
that's very interesting information! Do you have any download link for me about the PVC research?
Kind Regards,
Roman
that's very interesting information! Do you have any download link for me about the PVC research?
Kind Regards,
Roman